<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>alt.math Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math</link>
  <description></description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: rectangle geometry</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/be43ce8b1d0e11dd/3e0dfe3f0663c8d0?show_docid=3e0dfe3f0663c8d0</link>
  <description>
  Hi, Philippe, and thanks for your response. The answer to your &lt;br&gt; question is because that was the condition posed by a certain &lt;br&gt; mathematical problem I ran across on the sci.math site some time ago. &lt;br&gt; It had to do with a square, but I expanded it to include rectangles of &lt;br&gt; any aspect ratio. I solved the new problem to my satisfaction, but
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/be43ce8b1d0e11dd/3e0dfe3f0663c8d0?show_docid=3e0dfe3f0663c8d0</guid>
  <author>
  ghug...@magtel.com
  (Grover Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 nov 2009 17:23:20 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Ping-Pong Ball and The Sun / S D Rodrian</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/243fcc243bdea909/e236267afb802de3?show_docid=e236267afb802de3</link>
  <description>
  Rather than a cavity, the region is one of zero gravity! &lt;br&gt; The pressure assures that nucleii are closest to one anotther there. Fusion &lt;br&gt; could be self-regulating... If it gets too hot, the core expands, moderation &lt;br&gt; occurs and the fusion slows, etc. No thermostat required. &lt;br&gt; The vacuum concept is the one that does not occur, per se. In its place is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/243fcc243bdea909/e236267afb802de3?show_docid=e236267afb802de3</guid>
  <author>
  a.campane...@att.net
  (Angelo Campanella)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 21 nov 2009 05:29:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: rectangle geometry</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/be43ce8b1d0e11dd/a9ee7874bf7012ec?show_docid=a9ee7874bf7012ec</link>
  <description>
  Grover Hughes wrote : &lt;br&gt; Hi, &lt;br&gt; Why do you restrict your problem of &amp;quot;radiused corners&amp;quot;, if I correctly &lt;br&gt; understand what you mean by that, to rectangles ? &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IsoperimetricProblem.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/be43ce8b1d0e11dd/a9ee7874bf7012ec?show_docid=a9ee7874bf7012ec</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@free.invalid
  (Philippe 92)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 nov 2009 16:49:39 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>rectangle geometry</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/be43ce8b1d0e11dd/8b17692c720297bf?show_docid=8b17692c720297bf</link>
  <description>
  Is there a name given to the problem of finding the maximum area-to- &lt;br&gt; perimeter ratio of a rectangle having radiused corners?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/be43ce8b1d0e11dd/8b17692c720297bf?show_docid=8b17692c720297bf</guid>
  <author>
  ghug...@magtel.com
  (Grover Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 nov 2009 22:46:46 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Inverse Trig Functions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/1c7a28510b7ab252?show_docid=1c7a28510b7ab252</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;YuydnZrhleKNo5jWnZ2dnUVZ_j2dn ...@earthlink.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; But if you can already prove the given statement false by citing a &lt;br&gt; specific counterexample, there is no need for anything further.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/1c7a28510b7ab252?show_docid=1c7a28510b7ab252</guid>
  <author>
  vir...@home.esc
  (Virgil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 nov 2009 19:01:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Inverse Trig Functions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/e5cd48d502c29ccf?show_docid=e5cd48d502c29ccf</link>
  <description>
  Well all of the other problems in this section use the regular trig &lt;br&gt; functions and trigonometric identities to get rid of the inverse functions &lt;br&gt; in order to develop the solution. Sort of like getting rid of arcsin x by &lt;br&gt; taking sin (arcsin x) to obtain x.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/e5cd48d502c29ccf?show_docid=e5cd48d502c29ccf</guid>
  <author>
  chot...@earthlink.net
  (Charles Hottel)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 nov 2009 12:46:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Roots to Power Series</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/ca34cc11e5366620/9f28eb784b1f07fd?show_docid=9f28eb784b1f07fd</link>
  <description>
  Jon wrote: &lt;br&gt; Abel had something to say about this. &lt;br&gt; Nice crosspost to 30 newsgroups too, shitbird.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/ca34cc11e5366620/9f28eb784b1f07fd?show_docid=9f28eb784b1f07fd</guid>
  <author>
  jowr.pi.nos...@gmail.com
  (eric gisse)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 nov 2009 08:58:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Roots to Power Series</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/ca34cc11e5366620/8bffa143aef03cac?show_docid=8bffa143aef03cac</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://jons-math.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; If this solution is wrong, why did I do everything right to arrive at it? &lt;br&gt; Here it is, then. All the roots to any power series.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/ca34cc11e5366620/8bffa143aef03cac?show_docid=8bffa143aef03cac</guid>
  <author>
  jon8...@peoplepc.com
  (Jon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 nov 2009 06:34:33 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>triangulation bomb (minus launch location) -sbk</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/9c67d4a2e8afd025/8a25b0451fadf9b3?show_docid=8a25b0451fadf9b3</link>
  <description>
  Tan of pi(r)^2 = triangulation bomb w/default of pivotal position - &lt;br&gt; by sEung b. Kim
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/9c67d4a2e8afd025/8a25b0451fadf9b3?show_docid=8a25b0451fadf9b3</guid>
  <author>
  kims...@hawaii.rr.com
  (Deadspeak2)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 nov 2009 20:10:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Inverse Trig Functions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/983679ebcb01b4da?show_docid=983679ebcb01b4da</link>
  <description>
  with &lt;br&gt; the &lt;br&gt; One contradictory example is sufficient proof.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/983679ebcb01b4da?show_docid=983679ebcb01b4da</guid>
  <author>
  gneil...@movesympatico.ca
  (Greg Neill)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 nov 2009 04:11:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Inverse Trig Functions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/e2c8591250bf7fc4?show_docid=e2c8591250bf7fc4</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;h--dnS_UmqUe9J7WnZ2dnUVZ_sCdn ...@earthlink.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; What leads you to suppose that the left hand side can be made any &lt;br&gt; simpler that it already is?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/e2c8591250bf7fc4?show_docid=e2c8591250bf7fc4</guid>
  <author>
  vir...@home.esc
  (Virgil)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 nov 2009 03:53:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Inverse Trig Functions</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/89bf9d44df4d965d?show_docid=89bf9d44df4d965d</link>
  <description>
  Here is a true or false problem: &lt;br&gt; (arcsin x)**2 + (arccos x)**2 = 1 &lt;br&gt; I know that this is false and can prove it via a specific example, say with &lt;br&gt; x = 0.5 &lt;br&gt; However I seem to be unable to come up with a generalized expression for the &lt;br&gt; left hand side of the equation that would also show that it is false. How
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7a1219ce4fb25e2b/89bf9d44df4d965d?show_docid=89bf9d44df4d965d</guid>
  <author>
  chot...@earthlink.net
  (Charles Hottel)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 nov 2009 03:27:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>New Tech competition</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7b3a9760b5df93a4/fb66fdd24005345e?show_docid=fb66fdd24005345e</link>
  <description>
  Hi all, &lt;br&gt; Seen in Techcrunch, this competition should interest the group: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.beamindblower.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt; The company is looking for best ideas for games, laptops, phones, &lt;br&gt; music using this new tech: the 5 winnings ideas get $6,000, and more. &lt;br&gt; Ideas can be submitted by Nov 30, competition ends Dec 13th: the more
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/7b3a9760b5df93a4/fb66fdd24005345e?show_docid=fb66fdd24005345e</guid>
  <author>
  geekj...@gmail.com
  (Dorr)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 18 nov 2009 02:31:22 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Which game has more possibilities, stratego or chess ?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/0696ba390ded5d4a/aa31dd9446f21073?show_docid=aa31dd9446f21073</link>
  <description>
  Hello, &lt;br&gt; I am wondering which game has more possibilities for a computer to &lt;br&gt; calculate: &lt;br&gt; 1. Stratego &lt;br&gt; or &lt;br&gt; 2. Chess &lt;br&gt; ? &lt;br&gt; For stratego: &lt;br&gt; Calculation possibility 1: assume all setups are known in advance and &lt;br&gt; visible/open playing field. &lt;br&gt; Calculation possibility 2: setups are hidden try guessing, only one side is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/0696ba390ded5d4a/aa31dd9446f21073?show_docid=aa31dd9446f21073</guid>
  <author>
  bloodysh...@hotmail.com
  (Skybuck Flying)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 17 nov 2009 18:50:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Roots</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/9949eab6e3cb30f2/59e6149ce6ad0b22?show_docid=59e6149ce6ad0b22</link>
  <description>
  Roots to any degree polynomial, including power series: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://jons-math.bravehost.com/&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Jon &lt;br&gt; People PC deleted my entiere math website. I lost everything. I have &lt;br&gt; backup, but it&#39;s a piss poor way to treat a customer.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com.co/group/alt.math/browse_frm/thread/9949eab6e3cb30f2/59e6149ce6ad0b22?show_docid=59e6149ce6ad0b22</guid>
  <author>
  jon8...@peoplepc.com
  (Jon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 16 nov 2009 05:02:41 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
